Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 5 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJRES-V13I5P101 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V13I5P101Data-Driven Seismic Fragility Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Near-Fault Accelerograms
Mujahidul Islam, Mosfiqul Hossain
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jul 2026 | 28 Aug 2026 | 16 Sep 2026 | 03 Oct 2026 |
Citation :
Mujahidul Islam, Mosfiqul Hossain, "Data-Driven Seismic Fragility Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Near-Fault Accelerograms," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES), vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1-11, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V13I5P101
Abstract
This study examines the seismic fragility of 4-, 8-, and 12-story Reinforced Concrete (RC) Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs) under near-fault ground motion using an integrated fragility analysis approach. The research performs an exhaustive seismic fragility assessment of 4-, 8- and 12-story reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (RC MRFs) structures by employing 100 near-fault accelerograms (60 pulse and 40 non-pulse recordings), chosen from PEER NGA-West2 dataset and statistically verified. Ground motion parameters (PGA, PGV, Sa(T1), Sa,avg, Tp) extracted from time histories are used to build dynamic response spectra and to train four ML models based on ensemble methods—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Extra-Trees—with 4,800 Incremental Dynamic Analysis data. An event-based validation approach was employed to avoid any form of data leak from the training set to the test set. XGBoost achieves the best prediction performance (R² = 0.971), generating lognormal fragility curves with an area ratio ≥ 0.96 with nearly 98% reduction in computational cost compared to IDA simulations. SHAP analysis reveals that PGV and Tp are two important features of near-fault ground motion, as the collapse prevention median capacity of structures declines by 33% when shifting from low-rise to tall frame structures.
Keywords
Near-fault ground motion, Seismic fragility, Reinforced concrete frames, Machine learning, PEER NGA-West2, Incremental dynamic analysis, XGBoost, Pulse-like accelerograms, SHAP, Performance-based earthquake engineering.
References
[1] Guan Chen et al., “Seismic
Damage Analysis Due to Near-Fault Multipulse Ground Motion,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural
Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 15, pp. 5099-5116, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Ying Xin Hui et al.,
“Seismic Responses of Isolated Bridges Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions:
Simple Pulses vs. Whole Records,” Frontiers
in Built Environment, vol. 10, pp. 1-17, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Ehsan Dehghani, and Maryam
Soltani Mohajer, “Development of Fragility Curves for Conventional Reinforced
Concrete Moment Resistant Frame Structures,” Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, vol. 55, no. 1, pp.
31-41, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Mehdi Öztürk, and Mehmet
Ali Karan, “Impact of Near-Fault Seismic Inputs on Building Performance: A Case
Study Informed by the 2023 Maras Earthquakes,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 1-20, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Pablo Heresi, and Eduardo
Miranda, “RPBEE: Performance-based Earthquake Engineering on a Regional Scale,”
Earthquake Spectra, vol. 39, no. 3,
pp. 1328-1351, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Luis Guillermo
Alvarez-Sanchez et al., “Hazard-Consistent Simulated Earthquake Ground Motions
for PBEE Applications,” Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 15, pp. 4900-4918, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Timothy D. Ancheta et al.,
“NGA-West2 Database,” Earthquake Spectra,
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 989-1005, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Yousef Bozorgnia et al.,
“NGA-West2 Research Project,” Earthquake
Spectra, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 973-987, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Dimitrios Vamvatsikos, and
C. Allin Cornell, “Incremental Dynamic Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp.
491-514, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Farzin Kazemi, Neda
Asgarkhani, and Robert Jankowski, “Machine Learning-based Seismic Fragility and
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,
vol. 166, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Weixiao Xu et al., “Seismic
Fragility Analysis of RC Frame Structures based on IDA Analysis and Machine
Learning,” Structures, vol. 65, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Abdur Rasheed et al.,
“Machine Learning-based Fragility Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings,”
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience,
vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Sanjeev Bhatta, and Ji
Dang, “Seismic Damage Prediction of RC Buildings using Machine Learning,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural
Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3504-3527, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Ufuk Hancilar, and Eser
Çaktı, “Fragility Functions for Code Complying RC Frames via Best Correlated
IM-EDP Pairs,” Bulletin of Earthquake
Engineering, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3381-3400, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Michalis Fragiadakis, and
Dimitrios Vamvatsikos, “Fast Performance Uncertainty Estimation via Pushover
and Approximate IDA,” Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 683-703, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Noel Zavala et al.,
“Vector-Valued Intensity Measures based on Spectral Shape to Predict Seismic
Fragility Surfaces in Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Omid Yazdanpanah, Kiarash
M. Dolatshahi, and Omid Moammer, “Rapid Seismic Fragility Curves Assessment of
Eccentrically Braced Frames through an Output-Only Nonmodel-based Procedure and
Machine Learning Techniques,” Engineering
Structures, vol. 278, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Zhiwang Chang, Haoran Wu,
and Katsuichiro Goda, “Automated Parameterization of Velocity Pulses in
Near-Fault Ground Motions,” Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1006-1027, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Jack W. Baker,
“Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions using Wavelet
Analysis,” Bulletin of the Seismological
Society of America, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1486-1501, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Zhao Xiaofen, and Wen
Zengping, “Review of the Identification of Near-Fault Velocity Pulse-Like
Strong Ground Motions,” Reviews of
Geophysics and Planetary Physics, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 532–540, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Finley A. Charney,
“Unintended Consequences of Modeling Damping in Structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol.
134, no. 4, pp. 581-592, 2008.
[Google Scholar]
[22] J. W. Baker, “Efficient
Analytical Fragility Function Fitting using Dynamic Structural Analysis,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 31, no. 1, pp.
579-599, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]