Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 1 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJRES-V13I1P103 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V13I1P103Rupture Variations of Cashew Nut to Compressive Loading at Different Drying and Feed Rates
Okorie Uche Nelson, Oluka Sylvester Ike, Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 Dec 2025 | 16 Jan 2026 | 09 Feb 2026 | 27 Feb 2026 |
Citation :
Okorie Uche Nelson, Oluka Sylvester Ike, Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado, "Rupture Variations of Cashew Nut to Compressive Loading at Different Drying and Feed Rates," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 52-57, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V13I1P103
Abstract
The rupture variations of cashew nuts under uniaxial compression, considering the different methods of loading, drying, and feed rate, were investigated. Cashew nuts were conditioned by sprinkling water on the surface, separated into three parts, and later dried in an oven operating at the temperature of 121 ± 1°C and relative humidity of 40 % to moisture contents of 7.30% (w.b.), 8.45% (w.b.), and 9.60% (w.b.), respectively. Three loading orientations (longitudinal, lateral, and transverse) and three loading rates (2.5, 3.5, and 4.5mm/min) were considered at three replicates using a universal testing machine. The highest and lowest average values of rupture forces required to crack cashew nut were 322 N and 224.3N, at moisture content of 8.45% and 7.30 % with loading orientations on longitudinal and transverse. It was also shown that the highest and lowest average values of rupture forces required to crack cashew nuts were 514.3 N and 237 N, at loading rates of 4.5mm/min and 2.5mm/min, with loading orientations on longitudinal and transverse. The highest average rupture deformations, rupture energy, and young modulus are 2.62mm, 1.34J, and 159.3N/mm2 at moisture content of 8.45 %, 9.60 %, and 9.60% on longitudinal, transverse, and transverse loading, respectively. The highest average rupture deformations, rupture energy, and young modulus are 3.12mm, 1.90J, and 165.3N/mm2 at loading rates of 3.5mm/min, 4.5mm/min, and 4.5mm/min on longitudinal loadings. It was discovered that rupture variations of cashew nut were dependent on the level of drying of the nut, which showed that the cashew nut at the lowest moisture content required the highest rupture force to crack the cashew nut, and the best loading pattern for cracking the nut was longitudinal, which showed the lowest rupture force.
Keywords
Rupture, Cashew Nut, Compressive Loading, Drying, Feed rates.
References
[1] Sundarraj
Arjun et al., “Physico-Fracture Characteristics of Makhana (Euryale ferox)
Seeds,” International Journal of Food
Properties, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1204-1209, 2016.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[2] S.H.
Azam-Ali, and E.C. Judge, “Small Scale Cashew Nut Processing,” A Technical Report to Food and Agricultural Organisation
of the United Nation, pp. 1-70, 2001.
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[3] A.
Bart-Plange et al., “Some Physical and Mechanical Properties of Cashew Nut and
Kernel Grown in Ghana,” International
Journal of Science and Nature, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 406-415, 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[4] B.
Daramola, “Assessment of Some Aspects of Phytonutrients of Cashew Apple Juice
Ofdomestic Origin in Nigeria,” African
Journal of Food Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 107-112, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[5] I.A.
Enwelu, S.I. Ugwu, and I.Irohoibe, “Gender Roles and Challenges of Small Scale
Processed Cashew Nut Marketers in Enugu North, Nigeria,” Journal of Educational and Social Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp.
21-27, 2013.
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[6] W. Ezeagu,
“Assessment of the Situation and Development Prospects for the Cashew Nut Sector,”
Nigeria, 2002.
[Google Scholar]
[7] FAO,
Cashew Production in Africa 1961-2000, Food and Agricultural Organization of
the United Nations Production Data Base, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://apps.fao.org/page/collections
[8] M.N. Fernandopulle, Fertilizer Use in Cashew, Cashew Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 1, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams
[9] Simone
Giacosa et al., “Hazelnut Kernels (CorylusavellanaL.) Mechanical and Acoustic
Properties Determination: Comparison of Test Speed, Compression or Shear Axis,
Roasting, and Storage Condition Effect,” Journal
of Food Engineering, vol. 173, pp. 59-68, 2016.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[10] L.A.
Hammed, and A.R. Adedeji, “Incidence and Control of Twig Die Back on Young
Cashew in Ibandan (Southwestern Nigeria),” Agricultural
Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 171-175, 2008.
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[11] L.A.
Hammed, J.C. Anikwe, and A.R. Adedeji, “Cashew Nuts and Production Development
in Nigeria,” American Eurasian Journal of
Scientific Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54-61, 2008.
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[12] John
McLaughlin, Carlos F. Balerdi, and Jonathan H. Crane, “Cashew-Apple Fruit
Growing in the Florida Home Landscape,” EDIS,
vol. 2008, no. 4, 2008.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[13] Murat
K. and Mehmet Ali K., (2017), “Cracking Characteristics and Kernel Extraction
Quality of Hazelnuts: Effects of Compression Speed and Positions,” International Journal of Food Properties,
vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1664-1674, 2017.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[14] B.S.
Ogunsina, and A.I. Bamgboye, “Fracture Resistance of Cashew Nuts as Influenced
by Pre-Shelling Treatment,” International
Journal of Food Properties, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1452-1459, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[15] C.P.
Topper et al., “West Africa Regional Cashew Survey Report(Guinea, Guinea
Bissau, Cote D’Ivore, Ghana and Nigeria),” Sustable tree crop programme (STCP)
and Biohybrids Agrisystem Limited, UK pp. 1-110, 2001.
[Google Scholar]
[16] Kenneth
Chikwado Ugwu, and Wilfred Ifeanyi Okonkwo, “A Survey Questionnaire of Cashew Nuts Processing Methods in Enugu State,”
Agricultural Engineering International:
CIGR Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 134–140, 2020.
[Google Scholar]
[Publisher Link]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]